In California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. at p. 359 101 S. Ct. at p. 2809, the evidence concerning the admonition of rights was as follows: " 'Sgt. Byrd: . . . Mr. Randall James Prysock, earlier today I advised you of your legal rights and at that time you advised me you did not wish to talk to me, is that correct? 'Randall.: Yeh. 'Sgt. Byrd: And, uh, during, at the first interview your folks were not present, they are now present. I want to go through your legal rights again with you and after each legal right I would like for you to answer whether you understand it or not. . . . Your legal rights, Mr. Prysock, is follows: Number One, you have the right to remain silent. This means you don't have to talk to me at all unless you so desire. Do you understand this? 'Randall.: Yeh. 'Sgt. Byrd: If you give up your right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used as evidence against you in a court of law. Do you understand this? 'Randall P.: Yes. 'Sgt. Byrd: You have the right to talk to a lawyer before you are questioned, have him present with you while you are being questioned, and all during the questioning. Do you understand this? 'Randall .: Yes.' " (California v. Prysock, supra, 453 U.S. at pp. 356-357 101 S. Ct. at p. 2808.) After the foregoing admonition in Prysock, there was a discussion with the accused's parents, who were in attendance, concerning whether they desired to have an attorney present before questioning. (Id. at p. 357 101 S. Ct. at p. 2808.)