In Anderson v. Martinez, 158 Ariz. 358, 762 P.2d 645 (App. 1988), the trial court expressly recognized that the judgment being entered without the insurer's participation would result in the judgment having no binding effect. 158 Ariz. at 361, 762 P.2d at 648 ("I don't see that the damage figure in this case is binding at all on the insurance company, in that I don't think that the plaintiff has got much of a case against the insurance company, that this would be the damage figure that would come out of a hard-fought trial.") Despite the recognition that the judgment would still be subject to modification, Anderson determined that "while Morris concludes that an insurer may later challenge a settlement, it does not hold that an insurer must wait to litigate the issues." Id. at 363, 762 P.2d at 650. The court reasoned that it "would serve the purpose of judicial economy to permit the insurer to take this opportunity when all of the parties are involved and can present evidence to the court on the issue at one hearing." Id.