In Brown v. Industrial Commission 199 Ariz. 521, 19 P.3d 1237 (App. 2001), the claimant's entitlement to supportive care benefits was litigated and decided by an ALJ. Id. at 522, P 2, 19 P.3d at 1238. When the carrier subsequently terminated those benefits based on a new independent medical examination, the claimant protested. Id. at 523, P 7, 19 P.3d at 1239. On appeal, the Court held: Respondents did not seek review of . . . the ALJ's initial award, of supportive care and it became final. And, absent some change in . . . claimant's physical condition, or in medical procedures, . . . respondents insurer and employer are precluded from relitigating the supportive care issue merely by filing a notice of claim status. Preclusionary effect is given to prior awards not because they are correct but despite the fact they are incorrect. Id. at 525, P 17, 19 P.3d at 1241. Thus, the Court concluded that preclusion would apply if there is "merely a change in medical opinion" or the evidence presented is not "qualitatively different" from the prior evidence. Id. at 524, P 14, 19 P.3d at 1240.