In Griffis v. Pinal County, 215 Ariz. 1, 3, P7, 215 Ariz. 1, 156 P.3d 418, 420 (2007), the Arizona Supreme Court explained the process to be followed by a court when the presumption in favor of disclosure of public records comes into conflict with asserted privacy interests. Determining whether the public records law requires disclosure, then, involves a two-step process. When the facts of a particular case "raise a substantial question as to the threshold determination of whether the document is subject to the statute," the court must first determine whether the document is a public record. If a document falls within the scope of the public records statute, then the presumption favoring disclosure applies and, when necessary, the court can perform a balancing test to determine whether privacy, confidentiality, or the best interests of the state outweigh the policy in favor of disclosure. Id. at 5, P 13, 156 P.3d at 422.