In State v. Bly, 127 Ariz. 370, 621 P.2d 279 (1980), the Arizona Supreme Court held that neither double jeopardy nor double punishment considerations prevent the legislature from establishing a sentencing scheme such as Arizona's in which an element of a crime may also be used for sentence enhancement and aggravation. Bly recognized that "the legislature's power to define crime and prescribe punishment" includes the power to dictate that a given circumstance constituting an element of an offense--there, the use of a handgun, which converted a robbery into armed robbery--may also afford the basis for both enhancing and aggravating the sentence imposed for that offense and for "making probation unavailable and a minimum prison term mandatory." Id. at 372, 373, 621 P.2d at 281, 282.