In re Daniel D

In In re Daniel D. (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1823, certain orders continuing the child in foster care had previously become final and the appellate court declined to review them. It also said: "Similarly not cognizable on this appeal is the issue of the propriety of the court's April 1993 order denying Stacy's section 388 petition for custody modification based on the ground she assertedly had adequate housing for Daniel. Stacy did not appeal the order denying her petition under section 388. Since that order is long since final, it cannot now be belatedly reviewed. " ( In re Daniel D., supra, 24 Cal.App.4th 1823, 1832.)