In In re Frank V. (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 1232, the Court found a probation condition that prohibited the juvenile from associating with anyone disapproved of by his probation officer or his parents was "consistent with the rehabilitative purpose of probation and constitutional parental authority" and did not impermissibly burden his right of association. (Id. at p. 1243.) Although the juvenile challenged the condition as being overbroad, we determined, "The juvenile court could not reasonably be expected to define with precision all classes of persons which might influence [the juvenile] to commit further bad acts. It may instead rely on the discretion of his parents, and the probation department acting as a parent, to promote and nurture his rehabilitation." (Ibid.)