In In re J.D. (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 118, "the children's paternal grandmother had told DCFS that 'I can't say what tribe it is and I don't have any living relatives to provide any additional information. I was a little kid when my grandmother told me about our Native American ancestry but I just don't know which tribe it was.'" The Court concluded that the statement from the grandmother was "too vague, attenuated and speculative to give the dependency court any reason to believe the children might be Indian children." (Ibid.)