In Juan T. v. Superior Court (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 207, the probation report concluded the minor was fit; other evidence submitted to the trial court was ambiguous. The court, finding the trial court's mere statement after reviewing the record and hearing the evidence to the effect it was satisfied the minor was unfit to be treated as a juvenile, sent the matter back for a statement of adequate reasons because it could not follow "'the analytic route the . . . court traveled from evidence to action,'" or whether the court merely "'randomly leaped from evidence to conclusions.'" ( Id. , at p. 209, fn. 2.)