In Karl S. v. Superior Court (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1397, the court dismissed an untimely writ petition challenging the court's order that a section 366.26 hearing be held, rejecting the father's argument that the court's subsequent orders reconsidering and reaffirming its prior order terminating reunification services operated to reset the clock. "Former rule 39.1B expressly provides that the order setting a hearing under section 366.26 triggers the requirement to file a notice of intent, not any other order or finding." (Karl S., at p. 1404.)