Kunstman v. Mirizzi

In Kunstman v. Mirizzi (1965) 234 Cal. App. 2d 753, the plaintiff alleged an estoppel to assert the statute of limitations on the part of the insured for misconduct of the insurer's adjuster. Without discussing whether the insured could be estopped, the court concluded the facts alleged were insufficient to assert an estoppel. ( Id. at pp. 757-758.)