People v. Balderas

In People v. Balderas (1985) 41 Cal.3d 144, the defendant robbed the decedent. The decedent resisted. The defendant then shot the decedent. The court held that anger occurring when a victim resists during the perpetration of a crime is not provocation for voluntary manslaughter purposes: "This court has concluded, under similar circumstances and without extended discussion, that 'predictable conduct by a resisting victim' of a felony cannot 'constitute the kind of provocation sufficient to reduce a murder charge to voluntary manslaughter. . . .' " ( Id. at pp. 196-197.)