In Strasbourger Pearson Tulcin Wolff, Inc. v. Wiz Technology, Inc. (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 1399, the defendant attempted to disqualify the opposing attorneys claiming the attorneys who had represented the defendant's former auditor, had been privy to defendant's confidential information. In rejecting the argument for disqualification, the court noted that virtually every attorney disqualification case, "involved a current or prior attorney-client relationship between the attorneys for whom disqualification was sought and the party seeking disqualification." ( Id. at p. 1410, fn. 6.)