In Tilghman v. Superior Court (1974) 40 Cal.App.3d 599, a major portion of a spousal support provision of an integrated marital agreement was cited verbatim in the court's order, except that it eliminated the last sentence of the quoted paragraph, which provided that spousal support payments were nonmodifiable and would continue after wife's remarriage. ( Id. at p. 603.) In that case the Court concluded that after the trial court had "approved" the agreement, it did not have the power to incorporate into its decree most of the paragraph in question, but omit the provision that spousal support could not be modified. ( Id. at p. 613.)