Uhl v. Johnson

In Uhl v. Johnson (1956) 141 Cal. App. 2d 659, a nunc pro tunc order was appealable where the trial court attempted to "readjudicate the case under the pretext of correcting a clerical error and without a full hearing." ( Id. at p. 666.) There, the nunc pro tunc order amended the original judgment to reflect that the property in issue was to be held in co-tenancy in trust, rather than in joint tenancy.