In Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Northern Ins. Co. &c., 249 Ga. App. 532, 533-534 (548 S.E.2d 495) (2001), the general contractor was not covered because he was responsible for the entire construction project, and thus the definition of "your work" in the exclusions was much broader. Id. at 534. The court in Sapp did not analyze the exclusionary language, but simply concluded that the exclusions unambiguously "exclude coverage for defective workmanship by the insured . . . causing damage to the construction project itself." Id. at 203.