Gremillion v. State

In Gremillion v. State, 233 Ga. App. 393, 396-397 (3) (504 S.E.2d 265) (1998) the Court concluded that a trial court did not abuse its discretion when it limited a defendant's cross-examination of a police officer because the answers could have revealed the identity of a confidential informant. In Gremillion, as in the case sub judice, the trial court did not completely restrict cross-examination concerning the informant's reliability and veracity; rather, it carefully protected the identity of the informant.