Tindol v. State

In Tindol v. State, 284 Ga. App. 45, 46 (2) (643 SE2d 329) (2007), the defendant was sentenced for theft of a motor vehicle and was ordered to pay restitution for equipment that was in the stolen vehicle but was lost after he abandoned it. Supra, 284 Ga. App. at 46 (2). The Court affirmed the trial court's restitution order because "the act for which Tindol was sentenced, caused the disappearance of the equipment." Id.