Twyman v. Robinson

In Twyman v. Robinson, 255 Ga. 711 (342 SE2d 313) (1986), the Supreme Court reasoned that a self-insurance plan and authorizing certificate "serve as the substantial equivalent of a no-fault policy for the purposes of the no-fault act." Id. at 712. And "since the Uninsured Motorist Act in Georgia must be liberally construed, . . . a plan and certificate of self-insurance serve as the substantial equivalent of an insurance 'policy' for the purposes of OCGA 33-7-11, as well." Id.