In Nelson v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter R.R. Corp., 364 Ill. App. 3d 181, 190, 845 N.E.2d 884, 301 Ill. Dec. 19 (2006), the court addressed the application of section 3-102(a) of the Tort Immunity Act. The issue in Nelson involved the scope of immunity under section 3-102(a) and whether it could apply to an "activity" on the property or only to "conditions" on the property. Nelson, 364 Ill. App. 3d at 189. The Court held that section 3-102(a) immunity applies when two requirements are met: (1) the injured party was not an intended and permitted user of the property; (2) the injury arose from the condition on the property." Nelson, 364 Ill. App. 3d at 190.