In Countrywalk Condominiums, Inc v. Orchard Lake Village, 221 Mich App 19, 22; 561 NW2d 405 (1997), the Court held that the plaintiff was making a facial challenge to the ordinance where the complaint alleged that the ordinance at issue violated the due process and equal protection clauses in that the ordinance was arbitrary and capricious, and that it failed to advance any legitimate governmental interest. Consequently, finality was not required for the court to have jurisdiction over the claims because the plaintiff was making a facial challenge to the ordinance.