Occulto v. Amadar of New Jersey, Inc

In Occulto v. Amadar of New Jersey, Inc., 125 F.R.D. 611, 616-617 (D.N.J.1989) the court directed disclosure of a draft report which had been written entirely by the attorney as well as a cover letter directing the expert to type the draft report on his letterhead. The court there found that the draft was nothing more than factual material which should be available to the factfinder. The court also noted that the draft had particular relevance because when it was initially discovered at a deposition of the expert, the attorney initially denied having any role in the report's authorship.