In Richardson v. Nickolopoulos, 110 N.J. 241, 242, 540 A.2d 1246 (1988), the Court declined to reduce a period of parole ineligibility imposed on a subsequent sentence which was to run consecutively to the sentence Richardson was then serving by the amount of gap time he was awarded on the subsequent sentence. Richardson, supra, 110 N.J. at 254-55, 540 A.2d 1246. Instead, the Court held that gap-time credit is applied to the back end of the aggregated sentences, rather than the front end. See ibid.