In Anderson v. Carduner, 279 AD2d 369 [1st Dept 2001], the court vacated the lower court's dismissal of the complaint finding that whether the injury caused when the dog rose up on Plaintiff was reasonably foreseeable based on past behavior of the dog was an issue of fact to be determined by the trier of fact. A known tendency to attack others, even in playfulness, as in the case of an overly friendly large dog with a propensity for enthusiastic jumping up on visitors will be enough to make the Defendant liable for damages resulting from such an act.