In Anderson v. Seigel, 255 AD2d 409 [2d Dept 1998], the Second Department stated only that the authorizations sought in the case as to the academic records of the infant plaintiff's siblings and her mother, the mother's employment records, and the I.Q. testing of the mother, "were likely to lead to the discovery of admissible or relevant evidence." This finding was contrary to the trial court's demonstration that despite the submission of an expert's affidavit, the defendants did not cite any specific facts that the information sought was material and relevant. (See, Anderson v. Seigel, 175 Misc 2d 609, 614 [Sup Ct, Kings County 1998].)