In Blinds To Go v. Times Plaza, 45 A.D.3d 714 (2d Dept. 2007) the Second Department held that "the doctrine of laches, 'which bars recovery where a plaintiff's inaction has prejudiced the defendant and rendered recovery inequitable, has no application in actions at law .'" Id. at 715. Thus, the Second Department concluded that the lower court had erred in granting defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint, in which plaintiff sought to recover damages for breach of a commercial lease, on that ground. Id.