Crossland Savings, FSB v. Loguidice-Chatwal Real Estate Investment Co

In Crossland Savings, FSB v. Loguidice-Chatwal Real Estate Investment Co., 171 A.D.2d 457 (1st Dept 1991), the Court, did not accept defendants' uncorroborated affidavits as proof that plaintiff had made oral promises to forbear foreclosure, when these alleged promises were "directly contradicted by the unambiguous terms of the parties' mortgage documents which specifically precluded any oral modification, waiver or termination of any rights or remedies provided therein."