Feliciano v. Kia

In Feliciano v. Kia, N.Y.L.J., June 11, 1990, p. 26, c. 5 (App. Term, 1st Dep't, 1990), the Appellate Term, 1st Department, found that the appointment of a 7-A administrator was not warranted because any remaining uncorrected conditions were not so significant or numerous to deprive the tenants of essential services or endanger their life, health, or safety. (Id.) The Appellate Term accordingly dismissed the petition based upon its conclusion "... that the building premises are not in an immediately hazardous condition and that many essential services have been restored and the violations removed." (Id.)