In Finucane v. Interior Constr. Corp., 264 AD2d 618 (1st Dep't 1999) the First Department held that the laws of the state selected by the parties in their contract (Oklahoma) bore a reasonable relationship to the contract because one party's "principal place of business [was] located in Oklahoma." Finucane, 264 AD2d at 620. The court stated further that "even if New York were deemed to have a greater interest in the litigation, the fact that Wiltel's principal place of business is located in Oklahoma is a sufficient basis to support enforcement of the parties' contractual choice of law." Finucane, 264 AD2d at 620.