Goel v. Ramachandran

In Goel v. Ramachandran, 111 AD3d 783 (2d Dep't 2013), the Second Department held that plaintiffs made a sufficient start where "there was evidence of a close parent-subsidiary connection." The plaintiff in Goel "submitted evidence indicating a degree of financial interdependency," an "overlap of executive personnel," and that the New York entity had represented that the foreign entity was "the headquarters" and "main trading office" of the worldwide enterprise. Id.