In Grand Pac. Fin. Corp. v. 97-111 Hale, LLC (123 AD3d 764 [2d Dept 2014]), a case addressing the defense of unconscionability, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that the defendants therein had raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff had acted in bad faith and engaged in oppressive and unconscionable conduct in, among other things, allegedly preventing certain of the respondents from paying off the loan secured by the subject mortgage unless they also paid off certain loans made by additional cross-claim defendants and by Interfering with their attempts to obtain funds from, or sell the subject properties to, other investors.