In Groh v. Groh, 248 AD2d 354 (2nd Dept. 1998) the Appellate Division found the trial court erred in only using the defendant's income when determining the child support amount, in accordance with Domestic Relations Law 240(1-b)(b)(4). Further, the Appellate Court found the trial court erred in making no specific findings of the plaintiff's income or imputed income. Groh, 248 AD2d at 355. The Appellate Court remanded the case to the trial court to recalculate the child support amount based on the combined parental income.