In Kramer v. Hotel Los Monteros, 57 AD2d 756 [1st Dept 1977], the earliest of the decisions, it was reasoned first, that the statute "looks to the imparting of the original injury within the State of New York and not resultant damage, " and second, that "to hold otherwise would open a veritable Pandora's box of litigation subjecting every conceivable prospective defendant involved in an accident with a New York domiciliary to defend actions brought against them in the State of New York." (Kramer v. Hotel Los Monteros, 57 AD2d, supra at 757.)