Matter of Bakker

In Matter of Bakker (217 AD2d 363, 364 [2d Dept 1995]), the Appellate Division held that "the respondent's failure to provide her client with a timely refund, and her failure to comply with the Small Claims judgment filed against her is a violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 9-102 (C) (4) ... and DR 1-102 (A) (1), (5) and (7) (now [8]) [i.e., the prohibitions against violating a disciplinary rule, engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, or engaging in any other conduct that adversely reflects on the lawyer's fitness]."