In Matter of Capizola v. Vantage Inte. (2 AD3d 843, 770 N.Y.S.2d 395), the Second Department noted that plaintiff's proof was sufficient to establish his ownership interest. In particular, plaintiff supplied consideration for his equity ownership; a stock certificate was delivered to him reflecting such interest, and a K-l and tax returns listed plaintiff as an owner. The Second Department also noted certain gaps and lapses of credibility in defendant's position.