In Nanuet Fire Engine Co. No. 1, Inc. v. Amster, 177 M2d 296, following the majority trend, the court required the intruder to submit to the regulations of the host. But no paramount interest of the intruder was identified or discussed. The intruding project, apparently, could have been located elsewhere as an accommodation to the interests of the host in protecting a residential area. No declaratory judgment action was involved and, hence, the court concluded that it could not rule on the claimed immunity of the intruder.