Northside Sav. Bank v. Sokol

In Northside Sav. Bank v. Sokol, 183 AD2d 816 (2nd Dept 1992), "although the defendants opposed plaintiff's motion [for summary judgment] by claiming that they had never received the leased equipment, the defendants' unsupported allegations were contradicted by evidence that they signed a receipt acknowledging delivery of the subject equipment...and that they made 11 payments under the lease for the subject equipment." The court granted the motion.