In People v. Brady, 196 Misc.2d 993 (Dist. Ct., Nassau Co. 2003)(Kleuwer, J.), the court in fact rejected a request for a CPL 100.25(2) dismissal on this ground, observing that "no written notice of appearance is contained in the file . . . . More importantly, since neither defendant nor her counsel bothered to endorse the demand for supporting depositions with counsel's name, address and telephone number . . . defendant cannot now be heard to complain that the arresting state trooper served the supporting depositions at the only address available to him . Service in this case of the supporting depositions on defendant at the address designated in the simplified traffic informations is thus valid . . ."