People v. Urowsky

In People v. Urowsky (89 A.D.2d 520 [1st Dept 1982]), after defendant was arrested at the conclusion of an undercover buy operation, the defendant elicited a commitment from one of the officers on the scene that if he would show them where the rest of the drugs were located they would let him go. The Appellate Division suppressed both the statements defendant made on this subject as well as the drugs to which he in fact led the officers, as violative of CPL Section 60.45(2) (b) and the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine (Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 [1963]) respectively.