Quigley v. Sikora

In Quigley v. Sikora, 269 A.D.2d 812 (4th Dep't 2000), the Appellate Division sustained so much of a trial court order as set the case down for a new trial on damages, finding the $ 7,000.00 award for past pain and suffering deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation and that the failure to award future pain and suffering was against the weight of the evidence, in an accident involving (like the instant one) a pedestrian injured by an automobile, and in which the plaintiff had suffered fractures of a toe, cuboid, and one or two metatarsals.