In Young v. Seckler (74 A.D.2d 155 [2d Dept 1980]), an appeal in an automobile negligence action, the Court expressed its view that, "given the familial setting presented and absent the inference flowing from the insurance policy which designated the husband as the main insured, mere proof that the husband provided the money for the purchase and maintenance of the car would not have been sufficient to challenge the presumption of ownership [by the wife] raised by the registration."