In In re L.D., 8th Dist. No. 81397, 2003 Ohio 2471, the Eighth District did hold that a full Juv.R. 29 colloquy was not required at a permanent custody hearing. In re L.D. at P9. However, the trial court engaged in a lengthy discussion, on the record, with appellant and her attorney, discussing fully the rights she was waiving. Id. at P4. Indeed, on appeal, she conceded "that 'the trial court (did) an excellent job of reviewing her rights that she (was) waiving and the meaning and significance thereof' before accepting her consent to the agency's motion for permanent custody." Id. at P5.