In Myers v. City of Toledo, 110 Ohio St.3d 218, 2006 Ohio 4353, P1, 852 N.E.2d 1176, the Supreme Court accepted the following question, certified as a conflict: "'Is a ruling which grants a Civ.R. 35(A) motion for a physical or mental examination made in a special proceeding such as a divorce case or worker's compensation case, a final appealable order under either R.C. 2505.02(B)(2) or R.C. 2505.02(B)(4)?'" The court "answered the question in the negative. An order granting a physical or medical examination, made in a special proceeding, is not a final, appealable order." Id. In reaching this conclusion, the court considered whether an order requiring a medical examination, pursuant to Civ.R. 35(A), affected a substantial right. The Myers court stated, at P22: A party to a cause of action in which the physical condition of the party is in controversy does not have a substantial right to prevent a court from ordering a physical examination. Therefore, a court order requiring a party to submit to an independent medical examination, for good cause shown, does not affect a substantial right and is not a final, appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(2).