In Babal v. Babal (June 11, 1992), Cuyahoga App. No. 63044, 1992 Ohio App, the court described the requirements under Civ. R. 56(C) for considering an oral statement that has been transcribed. These requirements include an affidavit from the party conducting the audio interview, which identifies the time and place of the recording and indicates that the attached transcription of the audio recording is accurate. The affiant should also state that the audio recording was made with the knowledge and consent of the party being recorded. Id.