In Pruitt v. Pruitt, 8th Dist. No. 84335, 2005 Ohio 4424, the Eighth Appellate District concluded that the trial court's inclusion of "each party's Social Security benefits in its listing of their portion of the property division, did not amount to a division of their Social Security benefits." Rather, the court concluded that "the effect of the trial court's consideration of the valuation of each party's anticipated benefits was to offset the Wife's lower Social Security benefits against the other property of the marriage, which fell within Neville's guidelines."