In State v. Anderson, 1st Dist. Nos. C-050785, C-050786, 2006 Ohio 4602, the victim provided an invoice for the damage incurred to her property as a result of the defendant's crime. The defendant there also failed to object to the restitution order at the trial court level. As a result, the court in Anderson held: "We find no plain error in the circumstances before us. The trial court was permitted by statute to rely on an amount of restitution recommended by the victim. Anderson caused excessive damage to her sister's apartment, and the record does not indicate that the amount of restitution ordered was not based on the victim's economic loss. And, most telling, Anderson did not contest the amount when it was proffered." Id. at P9.