In State v. Bridgeman (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 261, 381 N.E.2d 184, the Ohio Supreme Court set forth the standard of review for a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. If "reasonable minds could reach different conclusions as to whether each material element of a crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt," then the criminal defendant may not prevail on a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. State v. Hall, Cuyahoga App. No. 90365, 2009 Ohio 461, P83, quoting Bridgeman. See, also, State v. Walker, Cuyahoga App. No. 89892, 2008 Ohio 4231, P36.