In State v. Gross, 97 Ohio St.3d 121, 2002 Ohio 5524, P19, 776 N.E.2d 1061, the two eye witnesses were individually shown the alleged perpetrator of the crime, Gross. Each witness saw Gross standing between two police officers near the scene of the crime. Each positively identified him. While the court held that the identification procedure was suggestive, it did not find reversible error because the identification did not create "a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification." Id. at P24.