In State v. Reynolds (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 158, 1997 Ohio 304, 679 N.E.2d 1131, the Court concluded that a motion styled 'Motion to Correct or Vacate Sentence' met the definition of a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to R.C. 2953.21(A)(1), because it was: (1) filed subsequent to the defendant's direct appeal; (2) claimed a denial of constitutional rights; (3) sought to render the judgment void; (4) asked for vacation of the judgment and sentence.' Id. at 160, 679 N.E.2d 1131. The Civ.R. 60(B) motion filed by Schlee was filed subsequent to his direct appeal, claimed a denial of constitutional rights, and sought reversal of the judgment rendered against him. The Court concluded, therefore, that the Civ.R. 60(B) motion filed by Schlee could have been filed as a petition for postconviction relief. Thus, it is not necessary to look to the Civil Rules or other applicable law for guidance in the way Crim.R. 57(B) intends, because a procedure 'specifically prescribed by rule' exists, i.e., Crim.R. 35."