In State v. Schlee (Dec. 23, 1994), 11th Dist. No. 93-L-082, 1994 Ohio App, the Court explained that "'sufficiency' challenges whether the prosecution has presented evidence on each element of the offense to allow the matter to go to the jury, while 'manifest weight' contests the believability of the evidence presented." Id. at 13. Thus, the standard to be applied in a sufficiency of the evidence challenge is: "When viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, a reviewing court should not reverse a jury verdict where there is substantial evidence upon which the jury could reasonably conclude that all of the elements of an offense have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt." Schlee at 14, citing State v. Eley (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 169, 383 N.E.2d 132. Therefore, a sufficiency challenge requires us to review the record to determine whether the state presented evidence on each of the elements of the offenses presented.